IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jieclw/v13y2010i3p817-835.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Role for Non-Discrimination and Prudential Standards in International Financial Law?

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Cottier
  • Markus Krajewski

Abstract

While principles of non-discrimination amount to key constitutional principles in trade regulation, most-favoured nation (MFN) and national treatment are virtually absent in financial regulation except for the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). The current GATS financial services framework aims at disciplining regulation and contains few, if any, incentives for the development of sound regulatory standards and institutions. Future amendments should create a framework allowing for the negotiation needed for adopting, incorporating, or referring to appropriate prudential standards and other common regulations for the financial industry within the GATS. Incentives should be created to develop and implement such standards as a matter of binding and enforceable obligations. The principles of MFN and national treatment will play an important role in providing level playing fields. Recourse to graduation allows different levels of economic and social development of World Trade Organization Members to be taken into account in shaping common financial regulations. Oxford University Press 2010, all rights reserved, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Cottier & Markus Krajewski, 2010. "What Role for Non-Discrimination and Prudential Standards in International Financial Law?," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 13(3), pages 817-835, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:13:y:2010:i:3:p:817-835
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jiel/jgq025
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:13:y:2010:i:3:p:817-835. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jiel .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.