IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jieclw/v12y2009i3p595-615.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aggressive Regionalism -super-† in Korea--U.S. FTA: The Present and Future of Korea's FTA Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Won-Mog Choi

Abstract

The Korea--US Free Trade Agreement (FTA) is a result of a paradigm shift from traditional regionalism, which deals mostly with customs--border issues, to 'aggressive regionalism' that codifies a whole-scale problem-solving process. A series of age-old bilateral trade disputes, such as the automobile trade imbalance, unethical business practices in pharmaceuticals and medical devices and effective protection of copyrights, were actively addressed between Korea and the United States, and permanent solutions to the problems were sought in the form of stable and binding FTA rules. New global or regional issues, such as the non-implementation of WTO panel decisions and South and North Korea's economic cooperation, were also dealt with. When negotiating future FTAs, Korea will continue to take the problem-solving approach based on this aggressive regionalism. Particular focus will be given to such sensitive issues regarding the trade remedy system, unfair business practices, sanitary and food safety and economic engagement policies towards North Korea. As Korea becomes part of more FTAs, transaction costs caused by fragmented FTAs will become an economic issue. In order to reduce the costs of the aggressive regionalism policy, Korea must adopt the advanced level of accumulation system for the rules of origin and it should endeavour to ultimately harmonize varying rules among FTAs. This strategy may start by linking to other FTAs. It is suggested that achieving such 'multilateral regionalism' should be a long-term task for Korea. Oxford University Press 2009, all rights reserved, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Won-Mog Choi, 2009. "Aggressive Regionalism -super-† in Korea--U.S. FTA: The Present and Future of Korea's FTA Policy," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 12(3), pages 595-615, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:12:y:2009:i:3:p:595-615
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jiel/jgp025
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:12:y:2009:i:3:p:595-615. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jiel .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.