IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jeurec/v23y2025i2p594-631..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Make Hay While the Sun Shines: an Empirical Study of Maximum Price, Regret, and Trading Decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Julia Brettschneider
  • Giovanni Burro
  • Vicky Henderson

Abstract

Time-constant trading thresholds are optimal for a large class of preferences and asset price dynamics, including, Expected Utility and the S-shaped reference-dependent utility of Prospect Theory. Such thresholds imply selling stocks at the maximum price since purchase. We use a large discount brokerage dataset containing US households’ trading records between 1991 and 1996 to document that in 31.6% of cases the stocks sold for a gain are sold on the day when the maximum since purchase occurs. However, not all stocks are sold at a maximum since purchase and the propensity to sell changes depending on how far in time and price the stock is with respect to this past maximum. We find that the propensity to sell initially increases as the price is closer to the past maximum but it then decreases when the price gets in the closest region to the past maximum, leading to an inverse U-shape; and that investors are less likely to sell a gain, the further away in time the maximum price occurred. Studying the joint effect of price and time distance, we find that the propensity to sell is highest at low time distance and high price distance from the maximum since purchase. We relate these findings to regret, belief updating, and attention.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia Brettschneider & Giovanni Burro & Vicky Henderson, 2025. "Make Hay While the Sun Shines: an Empirical Study of Maximum Price, Regret, and Trading Decisions," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 23(2), pages 594-631.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jeurec:v:23:y:2025:i:2:p:594-631.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jeea/jvae028
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jeurec:v:23:y:2025:i:2:p:594-631.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jeea .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.