IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jeurec/v18y2020i5p2135-2181..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do the Unemployed Pay Lower Prices? A Reassessment of the Value of Unemployment Insurance
[Consumption Versus Expenditure]

Author

Listed:
  • Rodolfo G Campos
  • Iliana Reggio

Abstract

It is well known that transitions from employment to unemployment reduce consumption expenditure, but is this fall mainly driven by quantities or by prices? Using panel data on expenditure and quantities from the Spanish consumption survey we find that the unemployed pay prices that are, on average, 1.5% lower, and that this difference in prices accounts for roughly one sixth of the gap in consumption expenditure between the employed and the unemployed. The reduction in prices estimated with panel data is considerably lower than the existing estimates for the United States, which rely on cross-sectional comparisons. Based on our estimates, and using economic theory, we reassess the value of providing unemployment insurance and show how the social value of providing unemployment insurance can be decomposed into a consumption-smoothing component and a component that depends on prices.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodolfo G Campos & Iliana Reggio, 2020. "Do the Unemployed Pay Lower Prices? A Reassessment of the Value of Unemployment Insurance [Consumption Versus Expenditure]," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 18(5), pages 2135-2181.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jeurec:v:18:y:2020:i:5:p:2135-2181.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jeea/jvz043
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wei Fu & Chen Huang & Feng Liu, 2023. "Unemployment benefits, food insecurity, and supplemental nutrition assistance program spending," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(2), pages 479-502, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jeurec:v:18:y:2020:i:5:p:2135-2181.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jeea .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.