IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jeurec/v18y2020i4p1928-1968..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intrahousehold Bargaining, Female Autonomy, and Labor Supply: Theory and Evidence from India

Author

Listed:
  • Rachel Heath
  • Xu Tan

Abstract

Standard models of labor supply predict that unearned income decreases labor supply. We propose an alternative noncooperative household model in which a woman’s unearned income improves her autonomy within the household, which raises her gains from working and can increase her labor supply. We find empirical support for this model, using women’s exposure to the Hindu Succession Act in India as a source of exogenous variation in their unearned income. Exposure to the Hindu Succession Act increases a woman’s labor supply by between 3.8 and 6.1 percentage points, particularly into high-paying jobs. Autonomy increased by 0.17 standard deviations, suggesting that control of income is a potential channel for these effects. Thus, policies that empower women can have an additional impact on the labor market, which can further reinforce autonomy increases.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachel Heath & Xu Tan, 2020. "Intrahousehold Bargaining, Female Autonomy, and Labor Supply: Theory and Evidence from India," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 18(4), pages 1928-1968.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:jeurec:v:18:y:2020:i:4:p:1928-1968.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jeea/jvz026
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jeurec:v:18:y:2020:i:4:p:1928-1968.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jeea .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.