IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jecgeo/v6y2006i2p141-149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

"The 'genome' of NEG models with vertical linkages": a comment on the welfare analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Carl Gaigné

Abstract

Ottaviano and Robert-Nicoud (2006) propose a general model that encompasses the model developed by Krugman and Venables (1995)--henceforth, 'CPVL model'--and the model by Ottaviano (2002)--henceforth, FEVL model. The authors demonstrate that FEVL and CPVL models exhibit the same properties when agglomeration leads one region to have production in both the manufacturing and the traditional sector and the other region to specialization in the tradition sector. This note shows that both models do not share their normative properties when agglomeration leads both regions to fully specialize, one in the manufacturing sector and the other in the traditional sector. Copyright 2006, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Carl Gaigné, 2006. ""The 'genome' of NEG models with vertical linkages": a comment on the welfare analysis," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(2), pages 141-149, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jecgeo:v:6:y:2006:i:2:p:141-149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jeg/lbl002
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kristian Behrens & Carl Gaigné, 2006. "Developing the "outermost regions" of Europe: some lessons from economic geography," Working Papers hal-02285630, HAL.
    2. Fabien Candau, 2008. "Urban costs, Trade costs and Tax Competition," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 118(5), pages 625-661.
    3. Pierre-Philippe Combes, 2011. "The empirics of economic geography: how to draw policy implications?," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 147(3), pages 567-592, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jecgeo:v:6:y:2006:i:2:p:141-149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/joeg .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.