IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jcomle/v6y2010i1p11-31..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Easterbrook On Errors

Author

Listed:
  • Fred S. McChesney

Abstract

The 1984 article by Frank Easterbrook, The Limits of Antitrust, has had considerable influence on antitrust enforcement and adjudication. Principally, Easterbrook focused on the things that antitrust could not do well. When antitrust's reach exceeds its grasp, it creates type I and type II errors. But Easterbrook points out that, in antitrust matters, type II errors are largely self-correcting. Letting price-fixers go free may be a mistake, but cartels are prisoner's dilemmas, so the mistake is corrected in the market. Letting monopolizers continue to raise prices may be an error, but new-firm entry will solve that problem as well. Easterbrook provides a taxonomy of the sources of antitrust errors, including the difficulty that antitrust defendants have in explaining procompetitive rationales and the difficulty that judges and juries have in understanding the theory and empirics involved in antitrust cases.

Suggested Citation

  • Fred S. McChesney, 2010. "Easterbrook On Errors," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(1), pages 11-31.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jcomle:v:6:y:2010:i:1:p:11-31.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/joclec/nhp028
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • K21 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Antitrust Law
    • L40 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - General
    • L41 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - Monopolization; Horizontal Anticompetitive Practices

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jcomle:v:6:y:2010:i:1:p:11-31.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcle .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.