IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jcomle/v21y2025i4p534-564..html

Algorithms and Antitrust: a Framework with Special Emphasis on Coordinated Pricing

Author

Listed:
  • Roman Inderst
  • Stefan Thomas

Abstract

The debate about algorithmic collusion has solidified to a state where agencies like the European Commission or the UK CMA have acknowledged its relevance for the cartel prohibition in their latest Horizontal Guidelines. In addition, national legislators in Germany and Italy have, only recently, enacted special antitrust provisions to address, among other things, algorithmic collusion even outside the scope of the cartel prohibition. We argue that established legal principles behind the definition of cartel conduct are challenged by the means and forms of how algorithms can impact pricing. We put forward that key for any case analysis under the cartel prohibition and the new type of legislation is a counterfactual assessment, which reflects the capabilities of artificial intelligence-based pricing technology. Such counterfactual assessment hinges on the type of pricing algorithms and the effects that the blocking of certain functions of algorithmic pricing would have on consumer welfare. We develop a taxonomy of cases for the cartel prohibition, and we describe paradigms for the development of remedies within the scope of the new legislation.

Suggested Citation

  • Roman Inderst & Stefan Thomas, 2025. "Algorithms and Antitrust: a Framework with Special Emphasis on Coordinated Pricing," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(4), pages 534-564.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jcomle:v:21:y:2025:i:4:p:534-564.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/joclec/nhaf014
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • A13 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Social Values
    • K21 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Antitrust Law
    • K32 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Energy, Environmental, Health, and Safety Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jcomle:v:21:y:2025:i:4:p:534-564.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcle .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.