IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jcomle/v18y2022i1p135-167..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Common Ownership Patterns in the European Banking Sector—The Impact of the Financial Crisis1

Author

Listed:
  • Albert Banal-Estañol
  • Nuria Boot
  • Jo Seldeslachts

Abstract

We provide a description of ownership patterns in the top 25 European banks for the period 2003–2015, where we especially focus on the global financial crisis. Investment managers, such as Blackrock, are dominant in terms of number of blockholdings in different banks, maintaining fairly stable “common ownership” networks throughout our sample. However, the financial crisis led to capital injections by governments in several banks in trouble, which in turn led to a jump in holdings by governments, which typically are “non-common owners” (i.e., they hold only shares in only one bank). This jump translated into these investors temporarily being the top investor with a large share, and non-common owners being the majority among large shareholders. A brief comparison with US banks uncovers large ownership differences between the European and US banking sectors. We briefly discuss what these ownership patterns might imply for competition, stability and performance in the banking industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Albert Banal-Estañol & Nuria Boot & Jo Seldeslachts, 2022. "Common Ownership Patterns in the European Banking Sector—The Impact of the Financial Crisis1," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 18(1), pages 135-167.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jcomle:v:18:y:2022:i:1:p:135-167.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/joclec/nhab023
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jcomle:v:18:y:2022:i:1:p:135-167.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcle .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.