IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jcomle/v17y2021i2p458-492..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Analysis of the Altria-Juul Labs Deal: Antitrust and Population Health Implications

Author

Listed:
  • David T Levy
  • Luz María Sánchez-Romero
  • Clifford E Douglas
  • David T Sweanor

Abstract

On December 19, 2018, Altria announced an offer of $12.8 billion for Juul Labs, combining the largest U.S. cigarette manufacturer with the largest U.S. e-cigarette company. This deal is currently being challenged by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). We consider the antitrust implications. We also consider population health implications, which we argue are essential to a comprehensive analysis of the impact on consumers. Although the FTC antitrust investigation has focused on closed vaping systems, we argue that the relevant market is the broader nicotine delivery product market, which includes all vaping products along with tobacco products. With Altria having a large market share in the key nicotine delivery product submarkets and with important entry barriers, the merger potentially places Altria in a dominant position in the relevant market. In particular, competition in the vaping submarket is reduced, thereby likely to reduce the availability of less harmful alternatives to cigarettes.

Suggested Citation

  • David T Levy & Luz María Sánchez-Romero & Clifford E Douglas & David T Sweanor, 2021. "An Analysis of the Altria-Juul Labs Deal: Antitrust and Population Health Implications," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 17(2), pages 458-492.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jcomle:v:17:y:2021:i:2:p:458-492.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/joclec/nhaa033
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jcomle:v:17:y:2021:i:2:p:458-492.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcle .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.