IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jcomle/v13y2017i4p609-636..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

To Pool Or Not To Pool: A Closer Look At The Use Of Sub-Regressions In Antitrust Class Certification

Author

Listed:
  • Ai Deng

Abstract

Did the anticompetitive conduct in question impact all or nearly all class members? This is a question central to a court’s class certification decision. To answer this question, a methodology—known as sub-regressions—is being increasingly employed, particularly by defendants’ expert witnesses. A key step of a sub-regression type analysis is to partition the data into various subgroups and then to examine data poolability. In this article, I focus on three areas of interest pertaining to sub-regressions. First, I review the related law and economics literature related to this methodology. I then analyze courts’ recent class certification decisions in cases where parties introduced sub-regression analysis. I then discuss several methodological challenges, many of which have not been previously acknowledged, and present potential ways to address these challenges. I emphasize that a disciplined and rigorous implementation is crucial for the reliability of sub-regressions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ai Deng, 2017. "To Pool Or Not To Pool: A Closer Look At The Use Of Sub-Regressions In Antitrust Class Certification," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 13(4), pages 609-636.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jcomle:v:13:y:2017:i:4:p:609-636.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/joclec/nhx020
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jcomle:v:13:y:2017:i:4:p:609-636.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcle .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.