IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jassam/v13y2025i4p349-369..html

An Experimental Comparison of Modular and Non-Modular Approaches for Administering Surveys via Smartphone Apps

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Antoun
  • Brady T West
  • Xin (Rosalynn) Yang
  • Syed Junaid M A Zaidi
  • Jennifer Sinibaldi

Abstract

Lengthy web surveys can be burdensome for respondents to complete in a single session. This study experimentally examines the effects of different app-based surveys, some of which use a modular design, on perceived burden, breakoffs, and indicators of satisficing behaviors. Participants (n = 664) were randomly assigned to one of four groups: (1) a browser-based web survey (control group), (2) an app-based survey, (3) a modular app dividing the survey into seven parts, and (4) a sequential modular app releasing modules at 48-hour intervals. Our findings indicate that administering surveys via apps can reduce the perceived burden of the survey task and improve response quality. Additionally, we find weak evidence that releasing modules individually over time can further enhance response quality, although this approach results in increased breakoffs between modules. The implications of these findings for the use of research apps and modular surveys are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Antoun & Brady T West & Xin (Rosalynn) Yang & Syed Junaid M A Zaidi & Jennifer Sinibaldi, 2025. "An Experimental Comparison of Modular and Non-Modular Approaches for Administering Surveys via Smartphone Apps," Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, American Association for Public Opinion Research and American Statistical Association, vol. 13(4), pages 349-369.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:jassam:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:349-369.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jssam/smaf008
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jassam:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:349-369.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jssam .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.