IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jafrec/v29y2020i5p475-490..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is There Really a Foreign Ownership Productivity Advantage? Evidence from Nigerian Manufacturing Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Kilishi Adamu Alka

Abstract

The role of foreign ownership of an enterprise in impacting their performance is a vital policy issue for Africa. In this paper, panel data for manufacturing firms is used to investigate that role in Nigeria. After controlling for unobserved firm heterogeneity, inputs simultaneity, measurement errors and possible selection bias, I find that foreign ownership has a positive, but statistically insignificant, effect on total factor productivity (TFP). However, foreign-owned firms operate on a far larger scale than domestic ones, with much higher levels of employment, capital intensity and labour productivity. As it is labour productivity that determines the ability of firms to pay higher wages, the evidence presented in this paper suggests it is their ability to operate at higher scale, rather than having higher TFP, is what characterises foreign-owned firms in Nigeria.

Suggested Citation

  • Kilishi Adamu Alka, 2020. "Is There Really a Foreign Ownership Productivity Advantage? Evidence from Nigerian Manufacturing Firms," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies, vol. 29(5), pages 475-490.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jafrec:v:29:y:2020:i:5:p:475-490.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jae/ejaa003
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jafrec:v:29:y:2020:i:5:p:475-490.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csaoxuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.