IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jafrec/v24y2015i1p128-147..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Respondent-Driven Sampling: A New Method to Sample Businesses in Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Charles Q. Lau
  • Georgiy V. Bobashev

Abstract

Much of our understanding about contemporary African economies relies on survey data from small and medium enterprises. In this study, we apply a new method for sampling enterprises: respondent-driven sampling, or RDS. RDS is a modified method of chain-referral or network sampling, in which survey participants recruit other enterprises in their social network to the study. It incorporates a mathematical model to minimise biases inherent in network sampling. RDS has the potential to complement existing sampling methods, such as household listing, random walks and using existing frames. This study has three objectives: it evaluates the feasibility of using RDS to study enterprises, tests the statistical assumptions underlying the RDS approach and compares the sample characteristics with external data. We applied RDS in a survey of small and medium enterprises in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. To our knowledge, this is the first time RDS has been applied to enterprises. We find that RDS is a feasible, efficient method for obtaining a high-quality sample of enterprises: 608 enterprises were interviewed within 6 weeks and the statistical assumptions underlying RDS generally held. We also show that RDS captures less established businesses that are less likely to be in surveys based on government and commercial sampling frames. These findings lead to the conclusion that RDS is a viable complement to existing sampling methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles Q. Lau & Georgiy V. Bobashev, 2015. "Respondent-Driven Sampling: A New Method to Sample Businesses in Africa," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies, vol. 24(1), pages 128-147.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jafrec:v:24:y:2015:i:1:p:128-147.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jae/eju023
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jafrec:v:24:y:2015:i:1:p:128-147.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csaoxuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.