IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indlaw/v54y2025i4p816-846..html

Taking Human Rights Seriously at Work: The Past, Present and Future of Employment Law

Author

Listed:
  • Joe Atkinson

Abstract

Human rights are increasingly adopted as a perspective on employment law and the regulation of work. Yet there remains a lack of clarity over key questions such as how the relationship between employment law and human rights should be understood, why human rights law has had limited impact in this context and whether/how it might more effectively advance workers’ interests. This article uses the academic writings and judicial decisions of Sir Patrick Elias as a lens through which to consider these issues. It makes three central contributions, relating, respectively, to the past, present and future of employment law and human rights. First, it is suggested that employment law be reimagined so that human rights are a central and foundational concern, with a core goal of employment law being to ensure that human rights are taken seriously at work. Second, by reference to Elias’ scholarship and leading decisions, the article identifies the systemic barriers that mainstream interpretations of human rights law create to the protection of workers’ human rights. Finally, the article outlines potential future applications of human rights law in the employment context which, together, would represent a significant step towards a more comprehensive framework for protecting workers, that takes human rights seriously at work.

Suggested Citation

  • Joe Atkinson, 2025. "Taking Human Rights Seriously at Work: The Past, Present and Future of Employment Law," Industrial Law Journal, Industrial Law Society, vol. 54(4), pages 816-846.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:indlaw:v:54:y:2025:i:4:p:816-846.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/indlaw/dwaf033
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indlaw:v:54:y:2025:i:4:p:816-846.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ilj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.