IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indlaw/v54y2025i4p755-791..html

Of Judges, Jurists and Juristic Style: The Legacy of Sir Patrick Elias in British Labour Law

Author

Listed:
  • Alan Bogg

Abstract

This article considers the legacy of Sir Patrick Elias as jurist and judge. The bridge between these two phases of Sir Patrick's professional life is a modest juristic style. His scholarship was doctrinally focused and avoided grand theories of labour law, and it was cautious about proportionality and human rights. His judging was always sensitive to the proper constitutional limits of the judicial role in a constitutional democracy. The motifs of this modest juristic style included the importance of enforcing contractual bargains; a sensitive appreciation of the limitations of judging in disputes between parties; the challenges of achieving ambitious structural changes through individual cases; and the potential of 'ordinary' purposive statutory interpretation to achieve the worker-protective goals of employment law. The article concludes by highlighting the enduring importance of Sir Patrick's modest juridical style.

Suggested Citation

  • Alan Bogg, 2025. "Of Judges, Jurists and Juristic Style: The Legacy of Sir Patrick Elias in British Labour Law," Industrial Law Journal, Industrial Law Society, vol. 54(4), pages 755-791.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:indlaw:v:54:y:2025:i:4:p:755-791.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/indlaw/dwaf028
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indlaw:v:54:y:2025:i:4:p:755-791.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ilj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.