IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indlaw/v54y2025i2p324-356..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land Loss and Labour Control: The Intersection of Land Dispossession and Labour Law in South African History

Author

Listed:
  • Marthinus van Staden

Abstract

This article considers the intricate relationship between labour law and the dispossession of property, with a focus on the profound impact this interplay had on the lives of indigenous South Africans. Central to this discourse is the thesis that the dispossession of land catalysed a transition for indigenous populations from landowners to labourers, a shift that markedly diminished their quality of life. This exploration is contextualised through the lens of the landmark case of Izaacs v Government of the Republic of South Africa and Others, which serves as a contemporary reference point for understanding the enduring effects of historical injustices. The article explores the nature of labour or work prior to colonisation, offering insights into the indigenous socio-economic structures and their transformation post-colonisation. It traces the history of colonisation in South Africa, with a particular emphasis on how the systematic dispossession of land was instrumental in forcing indigenous populations into a new form of labour and servitude. This historical analysis is crucial in understanding the genesis of the socio-economic challenges faced by these communities. Furthermore, the article scrutinises the evolution of labour in the context of this dispossession. It argues that the legal framework surrounding labour, especially the contract of employment, played a pivotal role in perpetuating the subjugation of dispossessed populations. It is shown how the contract of employment, with its inherent element of control, became a tool for entrenching the disadvantaged position of indigenous peoples within the labour market. In its conclusion, the article synthesises these historical and legal analyses to argue that the legacy of land dispossession and the subsequent transformation of labour law have had a lasting and detrimental impact on the lives of indigenous South Africans. This exploration will not only shed light on a significant aspect of South African history but also contributes to the broader understanding of how legal frameworks can both reflect and perpetuate social inequalities.

Suggested Citation

  • Marthinus van Staden, 2025. "Land Loss and Labour Control: The Intersection of Land Dispossession and Labour Law in South African History," Industrial Law Journal, Industrial Law Society, vol. 54(2), pages 324-356.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:indlaw:v:54:y:2025:i:2:p:324-356.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/indlaw/dwae034
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indlaw:v:54:y:2025:i:2:p:324-356.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ilj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.