IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indlaw/v54y2025i1p117-148..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Culture of Commodification? Labour Rights in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Konstantinos Alexandris Polomarkakis

Abstract

This article examines the deficiencies of the labour rights enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (EU). It draws on the notion of labour as a fictive commodity in order to showcase how labour rights in the Charter can also be framed as being part of a commodification process, owing to a culture of commodification that is prevalent across the various institutions of the EU, and which has influenced the drafting, application and interpretation of those rights. As a result, labour rights may exist, but are only allocated a perfunctory role of maintaining the status of labour as a commodity. Their justiciability is questionable and there are limitations on their scope and direct effect. Finally, labour rights in the Charter are often conceived as subordinate to economic freedoms, exhibiting strong path-dependence and leading to a series of missed opportunities for their decommodifying potential to materialise.

Suggested Citation

  • Konstantinos Alexandris Polomarkakis, 2025. "A Culture of Commodification? Labour Rights in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union," Industrial Law Journal, Industrial Law Society, vol. 54(1), pages 117-148.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:indlaw:v:54:y:2025:i:1:p:117-148.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/indlaw/dwae019
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indlaw:v:54:y:2025:i:1:p:117-148.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ilj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.