IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indlaw/v50y2021i4p583-609..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Law and Legalities at Work: HR Practitioners as Quasi-Legal Professionals

Author

Listed:
  • Eleanor Kirk

Abstract

Building upon research that explores the managerialisation of law and the production of ‘symbolic’ and ‘cosmetic’ compliance, this article explores the way in which HR professionals understand and engage in the (re)production of legality at work. Drawing on interviews, observation and discourse analysis, it presents rich qualitative data on the legal consciousness of HR professionals to argue that the profession has become increasingly lawyer-like, or quasi-legal. Legal expertise confers legitimacy and authority upon a somewhat compromised professional identity, which clambers for status within corporate hierarchies. The mobilisation of law occurs in ways that reflect the familiar contradictions of HRM practitioners’ conflicted role as both ‘employee champions’ and ‘business partners’. Labour law is mobilised in ways that lend substance and authoritativeness to organisational policies and procedures, but also help employers to ‘sail close to the wind’ legally: law is harnessed to protect employers, keeping them out of court and legitimising a managerial paradigm of what is ‘right’, ‘fair’ and justifiable. The overall effect is primarily to strengthen the employer’s hand to act, whether by stifling disputes, conferring legitimacy upon organisationally defined versions of legality, or justifying core-periphery divides and the necessity for flexibility and organisational ‘agility’. The encoding of quasi-law can render labour law itself largely invisible to workers, making it difficult for them to have recourse to it when required.

Suggested Citation

  • Eleanor Kirk, 2021. "Law and Legalities at Work: HR Practitioners as Quasi-Legal Professionals," Industrial Law Journal, Industrial Law Society, vol. 50(4), pages 583-609.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:indlaw:v:50:y:2021:i:4:p:583-609.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/indlaw/dwab025
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indlaw:v:50:y:2021:i:4:p:583-609.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ilj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.