IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v35y2026i1p34-54..html

Innovation diffusion uncertainty: incremental and radical innovations compared

Author

Listed:
  • Henrich R Greve
  • Marc-David L Seidel

Abstract

Much research on innovations assumes a dichotomy of disruptive radical innovations versus more incremental ones and focuses on the diffusion of radical ones. However, incremental innovations have their own complexities. Some innovations based on incremental technologies may require radical organizational changes to implement while others are more fully incremental, leading to different technological and organizational uncertainties. Because incremental innovations can be consequential for both industries and individual firms, we develop theory on how the resulting diffusion processes differ. We analyze how the airline industry adopted three strategically important innovations with different technical and organizational uncertainty configurations—one purely incremental, one technologically radical, and one requiring radical organizational changes. The findings show information from prior adopters impacts adoption, as commonly demonstrated in diffusion studies, but only for the two innovations that were radical. The purely incremental case had no such effect. This overall suggests that firms rely on information from peer actions and early experiences to reduce both technological and organizational uncertainty similarly.

Suggested Citation

  • Henrich R Greve & Marc-David L Seidel, 2026. "Innovation diffusion uncertainty: incremental and radical innovations compared," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 35(1), pages 34-54.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:34-54.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtaf025
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:34-54.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.