IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v35y2026i1p222-242..html

Workplace governance and labor perceptions of technological risks and benefits

Author

Listed:
  • Jane Gingrich
  • Nicole Wu
  • Baobao Zhang

Abstract

This paper examines the connection between emerging workplace technologies and workers’ preferences, actions, and mobilization. Some workers organize against innovations in the workplace because they fear that the deployment of emerging technologies could exacerbate inequality. But more often, workers adopt or acquiesce to emerging technologies. Our paper argues that understanding workers’ responses (and non-responses) to technology requires taking the work context seriously. Drawing on interdisciplinary research, it conceptualizes different forms of workplace power that moderate the consequences of technological adoption, connecting these forms of power to various dimensions of workers’ preferences. It then reflects upon the methodological challenges of studying preferences and power. The analysis underscores the need for mid-level theoretical and empirical research of work contexts to advance the agenda on inclusive innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jane Gingrich & Nicole Wu & Baobao Zhang, 2026. "Workplace governance and labor perceptions of technological risks and benefits," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 35(1), pages 222-242.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:222-242.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtaf059
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:222-242.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.