IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v34y2025i6p1206-1228..html

The reorganization of the American innovation ecosystem and the challenge of translating science

Author

Listed:
  • Ashish Arora
  • Sharon Belenzon
  • Andrea Patacconi
  • Jungkyu Suh

Abstract

In this paper, we focus on lack of translational research as a potential explanation for the recent slowdown in productivity growth, as opposed to a slowdown in science or the decline in the novelty of science. We provide evidence that the translation of science (as measured through citations by patents) has dropped for novel science. This drop is correlated with the withdrawal of large firms from science (especially the physical sciences), as measured through their publications. Fields where venture capital-backed startups have entered have experienced an increase in the translation of science, but their entry has largely occurred in the life sciences and Information and Communication Technology. Sectors such as chemicals and materials science have instead been neglected, both by large firms and startups. Our results point to the role of large firms and their labs in facilitating the translation and commercialization of science. A growing division of innovative labor may have delivered gains from specialization in the production and use of science in some sectors, but appears to have left a void in others.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashish Arora & Sharon Belenzon & Andrea Patacconi & Jungkyu Suh, 2025. "The reorganization of the American innovation ecosystem and the challenge of translating science," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 34(6), pages 1206-1228.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:34:y:2025:i:6:p:1206-1228.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtaf050
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:34:y:2025:i:6:p:1206-1228.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.