IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v34y2025i5p901-926..html

Exploring complementarities in innovation among research, development, and university technology transfers

Author

Listed:
  • Abel Lucena
  • Stephen Roper
  • Óscar Vicente-Chirivella

Abstract

This study empirically examines how university technology transfers influence the differential innovation returns firms derive from their (i) research and (ii) development activities. Both are usually considered together as components of the research and development (R&D) function. We explore how the specialization benefits from a division of innovative labor between firms and universities enhance the innovation returns of both R&D components. Using a sample of Spanish companies from 2004 to 2016, we find improvements in the innovation returns of their R&D components only when (i) firms internally specialize in either research or development while sourcing complementary R&D services from universities and (ii) firms use outsourcing contracts to access these university R&D services.

Suggested Citation

  • Abel Lucena & Stephen Roper & Óscar Vicente-Chirivella, 2025. "Exploring complementarities in innovation among research, development, and university technology transfers," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 34(5), pages 901-926.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:34:y:2025:i:5:p:901-926.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtaf007
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:34:y:2025:i:5:p:901-926.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.