IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v34y2025i5p1006-1028..html

Internal organization and absorptive capacity in open innovation contexts: the roles of gatekeeping, task specialization, and delegation

Author

Listed:
  • Angelo Cavallo
  • Massimo G Colombo
  • Nicolai J Foss

Abstract

Firms increasingly face strategic choices in the innovation process concerning how and to what extent they should source knowledge from external parties. We offer new insight into the organizational design aspect of this process. Specifically, we build a model informed by organization theory and organizational economics to examine how firms’ returns from absorbing knowledge vary as a function of their choices concerning the specialization of gatekeepers and the delegation of decision-making authority. We compare returns under different organizational configurations and contingencies and derive propositions about how firms should optimally organize to absorb external knowledge. We provide qualitative evidence of how firms organize their external knowledge absorption activities from four “real-life” cases that illustrate the propositions of our model.

Suggested Citation

  • Angelo Cavallo & Massimo G Colombo & Nicolai J Foss, 2025. "Internal organization and absorptive capacity in open innovation contexts: the roles of gatekeeping, task specialization, and delegation," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 34(5), pages 1006-1028.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:34:y:2025:i:5:p:1006-1028.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtaf018
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:34:y:2025:i:5:p:1006-1028.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.