IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v34y2025i4p805-830..html

Coopetition revisited: ambivalent impacts on drama program selection

Author

Listed:
  • Doyoon Kim
  • Taeyang Kim

Abstract

This study examines how competition and cooperation among diverse competitors affect viewers’ selection of drama programs. It explores the impact of internal and external factors, including structural industry dynamics and the emergence of over-the-top services. Environmental uncertainty moderates these effects, encouraging companies to adopt strategic approaches to attract viewers. Empirical analyses support the identified relationships, particularly regarding viewership ratings. Findings provide theoretical and practical insights for navigating competitive environments in the television drama industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Doyoon Kim & Taeyang Kim, 2025. "Coopetition revisited: ambivalent impacts on drama program selection," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 34(4), pages 805-830.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:34:y:2025:i:4:p:805-830.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtae047
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:34:y:2025:i:4:p:805-830.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.