IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v34y2025i3p563-610..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patent opposition, IP firm capabilities, and technology entry: empirical evidence from European patent data

Author

Listed:
  • Arianna Martinelli
  • Julia Mazzei
  • Daniele Moschella

Abstract

This paper examines the extent to which patent litigiousness relates to entry into a new technological domain (TD). Unless firms have sufficient intellectual property (IP) capabilities, patent litigiousness in the form of opposition may raise barriers to entry. We test this hypothesis using a large-scale dataset of patents applied for at the European Patent Office (EPO) between 2000 and 2015. We introduce a new measure of TD patent litigiousness based on the frequency of oppositions at the EPO. Patent litigiousness is negatively associated with technological entry for small firms, especially in high-tech and complex TDs. Unlike small firms, large firms benefit from previous experience with opposition, which favors the development of IP capabilities and reduces the uncertainty of entering highly litigious TDs.

Suggested Citation

  • Arianna Martinelli & Julia Mazzei & Daniele Moschella, 2025. "Patent opposition, IP firm capabilities, and technology entry: empirical evidence from European patent data," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 34(3), pages 563-610.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:34:y:2025:i:3:p:563-610.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtae034
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:34:y:2025:i:3:p:563-610.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.