IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v32y2023i5p975-999..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is the “sailing-ship effect” misnamed? A statistical inquiry of the case sail vs steam in maritime transportation

Author

Listed:
  • Nicola De Liso
  • Serena Arima
  • Giovanni Filatrella

Abstract

Improvements experienced by incumbent “old” technologies when threatened by new ones, potentially supplanting them, are often addressed as the “sailing-ship effect.” The latter phrase points to the eponymous case that consists of the 60-year or so technological battle between sail and steam in ships’ propulsion during the 19th century, which led to unexpected large advancements in sail technology. Paradoxically, until today, the only work which addressed quantitatively that technological battle actually found a lack of evidence of the occurrence of the sailing-ship effect. In this paper, through fresh statistical analysis, we find instead confirmation of the existence of the effect in the original case. This finding contributes to the theoretical debate that explains technological persistence through mechanisms such as path dependence, cumulativeness, localized technical progress, competence and cognitive traps, the presence of complementary assets and tributary innovations, as well as institutional features. Policy dimensions are considered in Section 7 of the work.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicola De Liso & Serena Arima & Giovanni Filatrella, 2023. "Is the “sailing-ship effect” misnamed? A statistical inquiry of the case sail vs steam in maritime transportation," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 32(5), pages 975-999.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:32:y:2023:i:5:p:975-999.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtad012
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:32:y:2023:i:5:p:975-999.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.