IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v31y2022i6p1358-1386..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The interplay between volunteers and firm’s employees in distributed innovation: emergent architectures and stigmergy in open source software
[Cumulative growth in user-generated content production]

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Michel Dalle
  • Paul A David
  • Francesco Rullani
  • Francesco Bolici

Abstract

This paper focuses on the interplay between firms and open and collaborative innovation communities. We develop a formal model where both volunteers (agents setting their agendas freely) and firm’s employees (agents whose agenda is mostly set by their employer) participate in the creation of a common artifact. In this framework, we discuss how firms can influence the architecture of the emerging product to assure fast and performant development and a desirable distribution of innovative labor within the project team. We find that closing the project only to employees implies high speed and performance if employees are given autonomy in certain dimensions and are directed in others. In this case, however, we observe a trade-off in terms of ideal core–periphery division of labor on one side and development speed and performance on the other side. At the opposite extreme, creating a volunteer-only project can ease the trade-off but assures positive results only if the firm is able to set up an entry mechanism that “surgically” selects volunteers with specific preferences. A mixture of both employees and volunteers can strike a good balance, relaxing the two constraints.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Michel Dalle & Paul A David & Francesco Rullani & Francesco Bolici, 2022. "The interplay between volunteers and firm’s employees in distributed innovation: emergent architectures and stigmergy in open source software [Cumulative growth in user-generated content production," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 31(6), pages 1358-1386.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:31:y:2022:i:6:p:1358-1386.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtac037
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:31:y:2022:i:6:p:1358-1386.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.