IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v28y2019i6p1587-1610..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competition, self-organization, and social scaling—accounting for the observed distributions of Tobin’s q

Author

Listed:
  • Paulo L dos Santos
  • Ellis Scharfenaker

Abstract

We develop a systemic, information-theoretic model of competitive capital-market functioning that can account for the observed statistical regularities in cross-sectional distributions of the logarithm of Tobin’s q for US non-financial corporations since 1962. The model considers capital markets as a self-organizing system driven by competitive interactions among investors and corporate managers. The persistent pattern of organization we observe in those distributions is primarily defined by the efforts of corporate managers to appropriate arbitrage capital gains defined by heterogeneity across individual measures of the logarithm of Tobin’s q. Competition ensures the structures of security prices shaped by those efforts reflect an aggregate tradeoff between the gross returns and costs they pose to corporate managers. The distributions are also influenced by the endogenous, competitive formation of the opportunity cost of capital corporations face, which is conditioned by what investors come to expect to be a typical or general expected rate of return on assets across all corporations. In addition to offering an economic account of what we observe, the resulting framework defines new conceptualizations and aggregate measures of the informational and allocative performance of capital markets. Those suggest the performance of US capital markets has deteriorated since the 1980s.

Suggested Citation

  • Paulo L dos Santos & Ellis Scharfenaker, 2019. "Competition, self-organization, and social scaling—accounting for the observed distributions of Tobin’s q," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 28(6), pages 1587-1610.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:28:y:2019:i:6:p:1587-1610.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtz027
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Scharfenaker, Ellis, 2020. "Implications of quantal response statistical equilibrium," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    2. Emanuele Citera, 2021. "Stock Returns, Market Trends, and Information Theory: A Statistical Equilibrium Approach," Working Papers 2116, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics.
    3. Ellis Scharfenaker, 2022. "Statistical Equilibrium Methods In Analytical Political Economy," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 276-309, April.
    4. Gregor Semieniuk & Isabella M. Weber, 2019. "Inequality in Energy Consumption : Statistical Equilibrium or a Question of Accounting Conventions?," UMASS Amherst Economics Working Papers 2019-18, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Economics.
    5. Paulo L. dos Santos & Jangho Yang, 2018. "Arbitrage, Information, and the Competitive Organization of Distributions of Profitability," Working Papers 1803, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics.
    6. Leila Davis & Joao Paulo A. de Souza, 2022. "Churning and profitability in the U.S. corporate sector," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(3), pages 924-957, July.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C46 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Specific Distributions
    • E10 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General Aggregative Models - - - General
    • G1 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets
    • L1 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:28:y:2019:i:6:p:1587-1610.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.