IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v24y2015i6p1215-1246..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technology familiarity, recombinant novelty, and breakthrough invention

Author

Listed:
  • Sam Arts
  • Reinhilde Veugelers

Abstract

Interpreting technological invention as a recombinant search process, we study the effect of combining formerly uncombined but familiar technology components on the likelihood of creating more useful inventions. For evidence, we consider 26 years of the US patent record in biotechnology. We find that the creation of new combinations of components not only stimulates average usefulness, but also leads to a significantly higher likelihood of breakthroughs, while reducing the probability of failure. Interaction effects illustrate how reusing more familiar components continues to foster the creation of more useful and breakthrough inventions while lowering failure but only as long as the familiar components are recombined in unprecedented ways. Yet, more familiar components are less likely to be used in new combinations and as such are more likely to be associated with a familiarity trap. Our results therefore illustrate how inventive success and particularly breakthroughs require a difficult combination of the reuse of familiar components and recombinant creativity, i.e. the ability to recombine the familiar components in new ways.

Suggested Citation

  • Sam Arts & Reinhilde Veugelers, 2015. "Technology familiarity, recombinant novelty, and breakthrough invention," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 24(6), pages 1215-1246.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:24:y:2015:i:6:p:1215-1246.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtu029
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:24:y:2015:i:6:p:1215-1246.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.