IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v24y2015i1p163-190..html

A Model of corporate donations to open source under hardware–software complementarity

Author

Listed:
  • Luigi Di Gaetano

Abstract

In recent years there has been an increasing diffusion of open source projects as well as an increasing interest among scholars on the topic. Open source software (OSS) is developed by communities of programmers and users, usually sponsored by private firms, is available in the public domain and redistributed for free. We present a model of open and closed source software competition in a differentiated oligopoly of hardware–software bundles. Hardware and software are complement goods and OSS is financed by hardware firms. Results are several. Hardware firms contribute to the development of open source, although the level of contribution is not socially optimal. OSS availability has a positive impact on hardware firms’ profits and prices, whereas the closed source producer is harmed by OSS competition. Furthermore, we analyze under what circumstances hardware firms have incentives in investing in OS projects. The model can explain the increasing participation in OS projects of several embedded device producers and server producers. Although we focus on hardware, this model can be generalized to a wide range of complementary goods and services, such as IT training, web hosting, and Information and Communication Technology (ICT) consultancy services.

Suggested Citation

  • Luigi Di Gaetano, 2015. "A Model of corporate donations to open source under hardware–software complementarity," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 24(1), pages 163-190.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:24:y:2015:i:1:p:163-190.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtu010
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Knut Blind & Torben Schubert, 2024. "Estimating the GDP effect of Open Source Software and its complementarities with R&D and patents: evidence and policy implications," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 466-491, April.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D21 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Theory
    • L11 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Production, Pricing, and Market Structure; Size Distribution of Firms
    • L17 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Open Source Products and Markets
    • D43 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:24:y:2015:i:1:p:163-190.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.