IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v23y2014i1p199-231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Persistence, survival, and growth: a closer look at 20 years of fast-growing firms in Austria

Author

Listed:
  • Werner Hölzl

Abstract

This article studies the survival, persistence, and growth of fast-growing firms after their fast-growth period, using an extensive data set of Austrian firms. We use two definitions to identify fast-growing firms. High-growth firms (HGF) are firms with the highest growth rates, while high-Birch firms (HBF) are the firms that contribute most to job creation. Matching as nonparametric preprocessing is used to construct control groups consisting of firms that were similar in terms of size, age, and industry affiliation to the fast-growing firms. We run survival, persistence, and growth regressions on the balanced data sets. The results point to differences between the two definitions but also show similarities in outcomes. We find that HBFs have a substantially larger probability of repeating their fast-growth event than HGFs. For survival we find small differences between the definitions. With regard to firm growth, we find that growth after the high-growth period is rather modest for both definitions when compared with the growth rates achieved during the fast-growth episode. However, both HBFs and HGFs have much higher growth rates than control firms. Copyright 2014 The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Associazione ICC. All rights reserved., Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Werner Hölzl, 2014. "Persistence, survival, and growth: a closer look at 20 years of fast-growing firms in Austria," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 23(1), pages 199-231, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:23:y:2014:i:1:p:199-231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtt054
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:23:y:2014:i:1:p:199-231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.