IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v19y2010i2p377-398.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of professionals in the Chandler paradigm

Author

Listed:
  • Louis Galambos

Abstract

Since many of the modern professions had a substantial impact on economic development, this essay examines Alfred D. Chandler's description and analysis of the business-related aspects of professionalization. According to Chandler, professional managers, scientists, and engineers made crucial contributions to the expansion of large enterprises in the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries, and these firms, Chandler contended, were the most important drivers of economic growth in America and the other developed economies. While this essay agrees with many aspects of that conclusion, it contends that the social transformation that brought professionals into power in business was more contested, more difficult to organize, and frequently less successful than Chandler indicated. Moreover, that transformation and the development of business capabilities in the 20th century cannot be understood without looking outside of the firm more than Chandler did. It is necessary to analyze the public and non-profit institutions that made professional development possible in the United States and elsewhere. It is also necessary to take note of the shifting public evaluations of the professions--those inside as well as outside of the business sector. Copyright 2010 The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Associazione ICC. All rights reserved., Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Louis Galambos, 2010. "The role of professionals in the Chandler paradigm," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 19(2), pages 377-398, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:19:y:2010:i:2:p:377-398
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtq009
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:19:y:2010:i:2:p:377-398. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.