IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ijlctc/v21y2026ip1e-16..html

Institutional openness and carbon neutrality technology innovation: evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaojuan Cui
  • Chenyu Song

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of China’s Pilot Free Trade Zones (PFTZs) on urban carbon neutrality technology innovation (CNTI) using a multiperiod difference-in-differences (DID) approach, with a balanced panel of 280 prefecture-level cities from 2009 to 2022. The empirical results show that PFTZ establishment significantly promotes CNTI, with an estimated coefficient of 0.284. This conclusion remains robust after a series of rigor tests, including parallel trend tests, placebo tests, propensity score matching–DID, and Bacon decomposition. Mechanism analysis identifies that PFTZs drive CNTI through three specific channels: the agglomeration of innovation factors (talent and capital), the strengthening of green financial mechanisms, and the upgrading of industrial structures. Further heterogeneity analysis reveals that the promotional effect is statistically stronger in cities with high intellectual property protection, strict environmental regulation, and high openness. Notably, the policy effect is significant in non-resource-based cities (non-RBCs) but insignificant in RBC, suggesting a ‘resource curse’ in low-carbon transition. This study enriches the literature on institutional openness and green technology innovation, providing quantitative evidence for aligning institutional reform with carbon neutrality goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaojuan Cui & Chenyu Song, 2026. "Institutional openness and carbon neutrality technology innovation: evidence from China," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 21, pages 1-16.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ijlctc:v:21:y:2026:i::p:1e-16.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ijlct/ctag002
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ijlctc:v:21:y:2026:i::p:1e-16.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ijlct .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.