IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ijlctc/v21y2026ip1-16..html

Urban carbon-sink enhancement strategies: a case study of the carbon-neutral square

Author

Listed:
  • Rui Liao
  • Jun Han
  • Congan Hu

Abstract

In the context of China’s nationwide efforts to achieve carbon neutrality across various industries, traditional squares can no longer fully meet public needs, making ‘ecological sustainability’ the central theme of square development in the new era. This paper, adhering to the balanced relationship among ‘carbon reduction’, ‘carbon sink enhancement’, and ‘livelihood improvement’ first, discusses the fundamental principles of carbon-neutral square construction, followed by an examination of low-carbon management methodologies for such squares, and concludes with an analysis of carbon offset mechanisms (including basic requirements, types of carbon offsets, and accounting methods). Quantitatively, the live-biomass sink exhibits a pronounced sigmoidal trajectory, increasing from 17 t CO₂e at commissioning to ~2296 t CO₂e by 2080, with peak annual uptake of 65 t CO₂e year−1 in 2037–2038. The work constructs a life-cycle standard system for carbon-neutral city squares—a management and technical framework that clarifies the concept and characteristics of carbon-neutral public spaces, informs municipal roadmaps to carbon neutrality, and supports low-carbon building standards.

Suggested Citation

  • Rui Liao & Jun Han & Congan Hu, 2026. "Urban carbon-sink enhancement strategies: a case study of the carbon-neutral square," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 21, pages 1-16.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ijlctc:v:21:y:2026:i::p:1-16.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ijlct/ctaf150
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ijlctc:v:21:y:2026:i::p:1-16.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ijlct .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.