IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ijlctc/v17y2022ip1280-1291..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CFD analysis and comparison of conventional type and perforated plate type shell tube heat exchangers
[Experimental and CFD estimation of heat transfer in helically coiled heat exchangers]

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmet Talat İnan
  • Hasan Köten
  • Mehmet Akif Kartal

Abstract

The baffle plate is the most important elements affecting not only the thermal efficiency but also the hydraulic performance of shell-tube heat exchangers that can be designed in different types today and can be put into the production phase. Different designs of baffle plates are closely related to thermal performance with pressure drop as well. In this investigation, the design geometry of the shell-tube type was carried out by means of the ANSYS Fluent program.In the analyses, it is purposed to examine the consequences on the heat transfer rate per drop of pressure and not only the pressure’s drop but also the coefficient parameter of heat transfer of the exchangers in which traditional one-piece type baffle plate and perforated type baffle plate are used where the shell side. Here, water is used as the working fluid; it was examined as 1.2, 1.5, 1.8 and 2.1 kg/h at four varied mass flow rates (m). As a result, the values compared to the traditional one-piece baffle plate and the perforated type baffle plate. It has been monitored that the heat transfer rates per drop of pressure vary.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmet Talat İnan & Hasan Köten & Mehmet Akif Kartal, 2022. "CFD analysis and comparison of conventional type and perforated plate type shell tube heat exchangers [Experimental and CFD estimation of heat transfer in helically coiled heat exchangers]," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 17, pages 1280-1291.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ijlctc:v:17:y:2022:i::p:1280-1291.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ijlct/ctac033
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ijlctc:v:17:y:2022:i::p:1280-1291.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ijlct .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.