IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ijlctc/v10y2015i4p374-378..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of sustainable information technologies for companies

Author

Listed:
  • Onur Kartal
  • Aslı Gül Öncel

Abstract

Ensuring the diversity of energy technology and using energy-efficient information technology are the key factors of sustainable energy politics in business. In the present study, we focus especially on choosing the best alternative to improve energy efficiency in business. In this context, this question may be analyzed via a survey method. We compare energy efficiency improvement alternatives of computer use methods in companies by TOPSIS methodology, which is one of the multi-criterion decision-making techniques.

Suggested Citation

  • Onur Kartal & Aslı Gül Öncel, 2015. "Comparison of sustainable information technologies for companies," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(4), pages 374-378.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ijlctc:v:10:y:2015:i:4:p:374-378.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ijlct/ctt047
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Indre Siksnelyte & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Dalia Streimikiene & Deepak Sharma, 2018. "An Overview of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Dealing with Sustainable Energy Development Issues," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ijlctc:v:10:y:2015:i:4:p:374-378.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ijlct .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.