Author
Listed:
- Mauricio Avendano
- David Knapp
- Mario Padula
- Giacomo Pasini
- Jere R Behrman
Abstract
ObjectivesDecisions over the life course, such as stopping school, retiring, or receiving care, are shaped by public policies and have profound implications for health and aging. Yet, studying the impact of these policies is hampered by a lack of standardized and harmonized policy data, making peer review and validation difficult. The Gateway to Global Aging Data addresses these barriers by collecting, harmonizing, and documenting policies over time on education, retirement, and long-term care (LTC) systems, enabling linkages to longitudinal data from international aging cohorts, thus accelerating research on health and aging.MethodsPolicies are collected using a strict protocol, documented using a common terminology, reviewed by country experts, and made publicly available. Subsequently, policy measures are linked based on individual characteristics in the international network of health and retirement studies and used to highlight cross-country differences in behavioral responses.ResultsApplication of the harmonized measures demonstrates that policies influence behavior. This is evidenced by changes in years of schooling through compulsory schooling and educational tracking laws, the timing of retirement through legislation on state pension age, and the use of formal care through legislation on eligibility rules for publicly funded LTC benefits.DiscussionHarmonized data on public policies enable research on how changes caused by policymakers shape human behavior and, ultimately, health outcomes. These data can be linked to surveys across the world. The Gateway Policy Explorer’s tools enable accountable and robust policy research on the causal impacts of health and aging policies.
Suggested Citation
Mauricio Avendano & David Knapp & Mario Padula & Giacomo Pasini & Jere R Behrman, 2026.
"Harmonizing measures of cross-country policies for aging research: applications to education, pension, and long-term care systems,"
The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 81(Supplemen), pages 75-86.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:geronb:v:81:y:2026:i:supplement_1:p:s75-s86.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:81:y:2026:i:supplement_1:p:s75-s86.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.