Author
Listed:
- Jinkook Lee
- Jenny Wilkens
- Drystan Phillips
- Emma Nichols
- David Knapp
- Jere R Behrman
Abstract
ObjectivesGiven global trends in population aging, there is a critical need for data resources to deepen the scientific understanding of individual and population aging. Understanding the correlates and consequences of population aging can yield not only biological but also social, demographic, and institutional insights, which can inform the development of more comprehensive, evidence-based policies and programs. We aim to provide recommendations for key content and other considerations in developing such data resources.MethodsThe U.S. Health and Retirement Study (HRS) is a model study, presenting an exemplary research design with evolving, innovative content. Building on the HRS protocol, there have been substantial efforts to adapt and harmonize the study protocol worldwide over the past two decades. We draw insights from experience in harmonizing aging studies for international comparisons and suggest recommendations for developing scientifically sound and cross-nationally comparable data resources.ResultsOur recommendations include prioritizing appropriate sampling strategies to obtain longitudinal and population-representative data and ensuring the inclusion of core content domains to enable the study of aging processes at the individual and population levels, with particular focus on the dynamic associations between health, economic status, and social engagement.DiscussionRecommendations can guide the appropriate design of future international comparative research. Measurement challenges across key content domains, along with the need to accurately capture contextual factors such as policies and environments that influence health and socioeconomic outcomes, require deliberate consideration.
Suggested Citation
Jinkook Lee & Jenny Wilkens & Drystan Phillips & Emma Nichols & David Knapp & Jere R Behrman, 2026.
"Recommended contents for a longitudinal, population-representative study of health, retirement, and aging,"
The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 81(Supplemen), pages 7-17.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:geronb:v:81:y:2026:i:supplement_1:p:s7-s17.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:81:y:2026:i:supplement_1:p:s7-s17.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.