Author
Listed:
- Laura M Klepacz
- Eric S Cerino
- Jacqueline A MoglePh
- Jeremy M Hamm
- Gali Weissberger
Abstract
ObjectivesPerceived control has been identified as a modifiable predictor of healthy cognitive aging. However, little is known about the link between perceived control and intraindividual variability in cognitive performance, a sensitive indicator of early changes in cognition that confers increased risk of later impairment. A better understanding of the association between perceived control and variability in cognitive performance is needed to elucidate protective psychosocial factors that buffer against increased cognitive variability.MethodsData from the Modifiable Antecedents of Memory and Behavior in Adulthood (MAMBA) Study (n = 217, Mage = 53.6 years, SD = 14.8, range = 30–80, 65% female) was used to (a) examine the link between individual differences in perceived control at baseline and subsequent day-to-day variability in cognitive performance and (b) evaluate when in the adult lifespan this relationship becomes most prominent.ResultsMultilevel heterogeneous variance models revealed that greater perceived control predicted less day-to-day variability (Level-1 residual variances) in executive functioning and processing speed, but not episodic memory. Subsequent age moderation models showed that higher levels of perceived control were most protective against day-to-day cognitive variability in early-to-late midlife.DiscussionStudy findings suggest that perceived control, a modifiable predictor of healthy aging, may facilitate the maintenance of more stable cognitive performance, especially among individuals who are in early-to-late midlife.
Suggested Citation
Laura M Klepacz & Eric S Cerino & Jacqueline A MoglePh & Jeremy M Hamm & Gali Weissberger, 2026.
"Perceived control buffers against variability in day-to-day cognition in midlife and older age,"
The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 81(3), pages 265.-265..
Handle:
RePEc:oup:geronb:v:81:y:2026:i:3:p:gbaf265.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:81:y:2026:i:3:p:gbaf265.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.