Author
Listed:
- Jo Mhairi Hale
- Angelo Lorenti
- Solveig A Cunningham
- Jessica A Kelley
Abstract
ObjectivesOlder adults are at high risk of the negative health impacts of social isolation and loneliness. One of those possible negative health impacts is Alzheimer’s disease, a leading cause of death for adults in the United States and many high-income countries. Taking a life course perspective, we explore whether there is a direct causal effect of social isolation on later-life trajectories of cognitive function, the extent to which any effect of social isolation on cognitive impairment operates indirectly through loneliness, who may be most vulnerable, and the potential efficacy of a statistical intervention for those living alone.MethodsWe use a counterfactual approach, the g-formula, with the U.S. Health and Retirement Study, analyzing data from 30,421 individuals with 137,653 observations across 2004–2018.ResultsWe find a consistent pattern of social isolation having a detrimental direct causal effect on cognitive function, with only 6% of this effect operating through loneliness. Reducing social isolation has a protective effect on cognitive function for all subpopulations regardless of gender, race/ethnicity, and educational level, with only minor differences among social categories. Our statistical intervention shows that targeting social isolation in those living alone may be one viable public health strategy for protecting against cognitive decline.DiscussionOur results suggest that addressing social isolation—and, by extension, its effects on health—requires both a broad understanding of its heterogeneous impacts on the general population and a nuanced approach to targeting public health interventions where they can be most effective.
Suggested Citation
Jo Mhairi Hale & Angelo Lorenti & Solveig A Cunningham & Jessica A Kelley, 2026.
"Disentangling social isolation, loneliness, and later-life cognitive function for older adults in the United States: evidence from causal inference modeling,"
The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 81(3), pages 254.-254..
Handle:
RePEc:oup:geronb:v:81:y:2026:i:3:p:gbaf254.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:81:y:2026:i:3:p:gbaf254.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.