Author
Listed:
- Daniel Harlev
- Aya Vituri
- Moni Shahar
- Noham Wolpe
Abstract
ObjectiveDepression in aging shows heterogeneous symptoms across cognitive, affective, and neurobiological domains. Traditional categorical diagnoses may not capture these complex patterns, prompting a shift toward dimensional or domain-based approaches. We examined whether the symptoms that bridge cognition and affect differ by age and explored their associations with brain structure.MethodsData from 756 young (≤45 years) and 1,230 older (≥65 years) adults from the Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience were analyzed. Cognition was assessed using the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination—Revised, and depressive and anxiety symptoms were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Graphical LASSO was used to construct cognitive–affective networks, testing for age-related differences in strength and bridging centrality measures. Building on these findings, we further examined the association between bridging symptoms, cognition, and gray matter volume (GMV).ResultsSymptom strength centrality was similar across age groups. However, significant age-related differences emerged in bridging symptoms. Specifically, the primary bridging symptom differed, with dysphoria in young adults and anhedonia in older adults. Follow-up analyses showed that cognition mediated the link between GMV and anhedonia, but not dysphoria, particularly in older adults.DiscussionCognitive–affective bridging symptoms differ with age, with anhedonia replacing dysphoria as the key bridge in older adults. This shift was linked to age-related differences in the relationship between GMV, cognition, and depressive symptoms. These results highlight the need to target different symptoms to alleviate cognitive–affective manifestations across the lifespan.
Suggested Citation
Daniel Harlev & Aya Vituri & Moni Shahar & Noham Wolpe, 2026.
"From dysphoria to anhedonia: age-related shift in the link between cognitive and affective symptoms,"
The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 81(2), pages 252.-252..
Handle:
RePEc:oup:geronb:v:81:y:2026:i:2:p:gbaf252.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:81:y:2026:i:2:p:gbaf252.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.