Author
Listed:
- Yaeji Kim-Knauss
- Frieder R Lang
Abstract
ObjectiveConfronting mortality is an inevitable aspect of aging. This study distinguishes two strategies older adults may employ to cope with life’s finitude: death preparation (an assimilative approach) and death acceptance (an accommodative approach). We examined whether these strategies are differently related to two well-being indicators, affect and the presence of meaning in life, particularly when individuals experience declines in resources, such as physical health deterioration and limited future time perspectives (FTP).MethodsData were drawn from the 2020 and 2023 waves of the Aging as Future online study in Germany. A total of 495 older adults (between-person level; aged 60–91 at baseline) contributed 990 observations (within-person level). We tested how death preparation and death acceptance were associated with positive/negative affect and the presence of meaning in life at both levels, and whether these associations varied depending on changes in health and FTP.ResultsBoth strategies were positively related to well-being, primarily at the between-person level. We also found significant interactions when declines in health and FTP were considered. Specifically, higher average levels of death acceptance buffered the impact of health decline on positive affect and mitigated the negative association between limited FTP and meaning in life.DiscussionOur findings suggest that death acceptance plays a critical role in supporting older adults’ emotional and existential well-being when facing health declines and limited FTP. These results extend theoretical models of self-regulation and aging by demonstrating how domain-specific acceptance of life’s finitude can foster resilience and meaning in later life.
Suggested Citation
Yaeji Kim-Knauss & Frieder R Lang, 2026.
"Coping with life’s finitude: the protective role of death preparation and death acceptance amid resource loss,"
The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 81(2), pages 251.-251..
Handle:
RePEc:oup:geronb:v:81:y:2026:i:2:p:gbaf251.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:81:y:2026:i:2:p:gbaf251.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.