IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v81y2026i2pgbaf247..html

Nonlinear decline in the association between birth weight and cognitive ability from infancy to midlife in a community sample of twins

Author

Listed:
  • Sophie A Bell
  • Sean R Womack
  • Alyssa Kam
  • Molly Gonenne
  • Christopher R Beam
  • Evan J Giangrande
  • Deborah Finkel
  • Eric Turkheimer
  • Deborah W Davis

Abstract

ObjectivesBirth weight is a widely used indicator of prenatal experiences in models of the developmental origins of cognitive ability across the lifespan. This study aimed to examine the association between birth weight and cognitive ability using a community sample of twins followed prospectively from infancy to midlife. We leveraged the twin study design to identify phenotypic and biometric associations between the two constructs.MethodsThe sample consisted of 1,501 participants (387 dizygotic pairs, 360 monozygotic pairs, and 7 singletons; 53.1% female; 91.1% White) from the Louisville Twin Study. We modeled the change in the strength of the association between birth weight and cognitive ability using exponential decay functions.ResultsThe magnitude of the association between birth weight and cognitive ability declined exponentially from infancy (β = .59, p

Suggested Citation

  • Sophie A Bell & Sean R Womack & Alyssa Kam & Molly Gonenne & Christopher R Beam & Evan J Giangrande & Deborah Finkel & Eric Turkheimer & Deborah W Davis, 2026. "Nonlinear decline in the association between birth weight and cognitive ability from infancy to midlife in a community sample of twins," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 81(2), pages 247.-247..
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:81:y:2026:i:2:p:gbaf247.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbaf247
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:81:y:2026:i:2:p:gbaf247.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.