IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v81y2026i2pgbaf239..html

The advantages of aging: greater stability of self-representation in older adults is linked to higher well-being

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Hennessy
  • Jessica R Andrews-Hanna
  • Matthew D Grilli

Abstract

ObjectivesMaintaining a coherent, stable sense of self is critical to well-being, particularly in older adulthood. Yet, little research has examined the objective stability of self-representation across the lifespan. In this study, we investigated how self-representation stability differs between younger and older adults, is supported by autobiographical memory in the laboratory and in daily life, and predicts well-being.MethodsThis observational study included younger (n = 51, aged 18–35) and older (n = 126, aged 60–90) adults. Outcome variables included personality, well-being, in-lab autobiographical memory, and naturalistic autobiographical thought. Using robust quantile regression, analyses examined age-group differences and interactions across self-representation stability, well-being, and autobiographical memory.ResultsWe observed that self-representation stability: (1) was higher in older adults, (2) predicted well-being across participants, (3) was not significantly related to in-lab autobiographical memory, and (4) was higher in younger adults who had more autobiographical thoughts in daily life.DiscussionThese findings suggest a link between self-representation stability and well-being, with age-related differences in its cognitive mechanisms. These findings further underscore an important positive of aging and offer insight into the connection between autobiographical processes and self-representation stability.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Hennessy & Jessica R Andrews-Hanna & Matthew D Grilli, 2026. "The advantages of aging: greater stability of self-representation in older adults is linked to higher well-being," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 81(2), pages 239.-239..
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:81:y:2026:i:2:p:gbaf239.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbaf239
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:81:y:2026:i:2:p:gbaf239.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.