IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v81y2026i1pgbaf229..html

Spousal education and cognitive trajectories among Chinese couples: a Longitudinal Actor–Partner Interdependence Model analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Guo
  • Zhenmei Zhang
  • Philip J Pettis
  • Quanbao Jiang

Abstract

ObjectivesAlthough prior research consistently demonstrates a positive association between education and cognitive functioning at the individual level, the role of spousal education in shaping cognitive trajectories is less understood. This study examines the associations between spousal education and cognitive trajectories among middle-aged and older couples in China.MethodsDrawing on 5 waves (2011–2020) of data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, we applied Longitudinal Actor–Partner Interdependence modeling to assess whether and how spousal education is associated with cognitive trajectories among 5,816 couples aged 45 and older in China. We further examined 3 potential mediating pathways: household economic resources, health behaviors and status, and social engagement.ResultsHigher spousal education was associated with higher baseline cognitive functioning for both spouses, independent of each person’s own education. This association was primarily mediated by household economic resources and partially by sleep duration, self-rated health, and social engagement. Spousal education was not significantly associated with the rate of cognitive decline.DiscussionThese findings suggest that spousal education is linked to baseline cognitive functioning through economic, behavioral, and social pathways, but it is not associated with the rate of cognitive decline. These patterns underscore the importance of dyadic resources for cognitive health in aging Chinese populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Guo & Zhenmei Zhang & Philip J Pettis & Quanbao Jiang, 2026. "Spousal education and cognitive trajectories among Chinese couples: a Longitudinal Actor–Partner Interdependence Model analysis," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 81(1), pages 229.-229..
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:81:y:2026:i:1:p:gbaf229.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbaf229
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:81:y:2026:i:1:p:gbaf229.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.