Author
Listed:
- Chen-Yang Hsiao
- Chia Liu
- Sun-Wung Hsieh
- Hsueh-Fen Chen
- Yuan-Han Yang
- Hui-Min Hsieh
Abstract
ObjectivesWhile the simultaneous rise of two major demographic trends—population aging and urbanization—has created significant global challenges, the long-term demographic impact on dementia prevalence remains unclear. This study aimed to examine temporal trends and urban–rural differences in dementia prevalence over a 20-year period (2000–2020) in Taiwan.MethodsThis study analyzed cross-sectional trends in dementia prevalence between urban and rural areas in Taiwan over five time points (2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, 2020) using the full population National Health Insurance database. Logistic regression models estimated adjusted odds ratios (AORs) for urban–rural comparisons of dementia prevalence, reporting AORs with 95% CI.ResultsUrbanization among older adults rose from 63.4% to 73.0%, alongside rising dementia prevalence in both settings. Initially higher in urban areas (2.79% vs. 2.56% in 2000), rural prevalence surpassed urban prevalence around 2010–2015 and widened by 2020 (8.23% rural vs. 6.81% urban). AORs for urban vs. rural prevalence declined from 1.02 (95% CI: 0.99–1.04) in 2000 to 0.95 (0.94–0.96) in 2020.DiscussionThis study highlights the significant impact of population aging and urbanization on dementia prevalence in Taiwan over two decades. Dementia prevalence increased markedly across both urban and rural areas, with rural areas surpassing urban prevalence between 2010 and 2015, likely due to decentralized healthcare and long-term care policies. These findings underscore the need for tailored dementia care strategies, especially in rural settings, to inform effective public health planning.
Suggested Citation
Chen-Yang Hsiao & Chia Liu & Sun-Wung Hsieh & Hsueh-Fen Chen & Yuan-Han Yang & Hui-Min Hsieh, 2026.
"Urban-rural disparity: temporal trends in dementia prevalence and the impact of demographic transition in Taiwan (2000–2020),"
The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 81(1), pages 218.-218..
Handle:
RePEc:oup:geronb:v:81:y:2026:i:1:p:gbaf218.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:81:y:2026:i:1:p:gbaf218.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.