IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v80y2025isupplement_2ps222-s232..html

Participatory approach, dissemination, and implementation of research on aging: the Age-It experience

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Chiatti
  • rco Alberio
  • Giovanni Lamura
  • Navid Nobani
  • Daniele Vignoli

Abstract

ObjectivesAs populations age, health, social, and long-term care policies must promote well-being, active participation, and inclusion in later life. This article examines how dissemination and participatory strategies can bridge research and practice, drawing on the Age-It Research Program—one of Europe’s largest transdisciplinary initiatives on aging.MethodsAge-It involves 1,000+ researchers across 10 “Spokes†and several cross-cutting Boards, engaging more than 100 stakeholder organizations. We describe the overarching dissemination and co-creation strategy developed by the Stakeholders and Dissemination Board, acknowledging the diverse participatory practices within Spokes. We term our approach incremental participatory, recognizing both early stakeholder involvement and the practical constraints of coordinating a program of this scale.ResultsOur experience highlights three key lessons. First, establishing a shared language, timeframe, and platform is essential for transdisciplinary collaboration and stakeholder engagement. Second, dissemination and knowledge mobilization must be embedded throughout the research process rather than treated as a final stage activity, combining digital tools (e.g., WikiAge-It, the Age-It Dashboard) with offline, community-based events to foster inclusive participation. Third, while co-creation enhances legiticy and relevance, sustaining active engagement requires significant investments in resources, infrastructures, and facilitation processes.DiscussionBy integrating participatory research principles with implementation science frameworks, Age-It demonstrates how structured collaboration and knowledge mobilization can support evidence-based policies and practices. However, challenges rein, including uneven stakeholder engagement, time constraints, and the difficulty of translating complex scientific insights into actionable forts. We conclude that dissemination and participatory approaches in aging research must be seen as dynamic, iterative, and resource-intensive processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Chiatti & rco Alberio & Giovanni Lamura & Navid Nobani & Daniele Vignoli, 2025. "Participatory approach, dissemination, and implementation of research on aging: the Age-It experience," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 80(Supplemen), pages 222-232.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:supplement_2:p:s222-s232.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbaf203
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:supplement_2:p:s222-s232.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.