IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v80y2025isupplement_2ps169-s179..html

An index of intergenerational justice: in concepts and preliminary evidence from the Age-It Research Program

Author

Listed:
  • Vincenzo Galasso
  • Anna Elisabetta Galeotti
  • Asya Bellia
  • Enrico Biale
  • Carlo Burelli
  • Davide Pala
  • Cristobal Ruiz-Tagle Colo
  • Laura Santi Antini
  • Gloria Zuccarelli

Abstract

ObjectivesAging reshapes the balance between younger and older generations within the population. These demographic shifts have significant implications for economic and environmental resource allocations and the transfortion of social and political status and individual rights. To explore these dynamics, we present findings from Spoke 7 (Cultural and Political Dimensions of Ageing Societies) of the Age-It Research Program, which has developed a novel Index of Intergenerational Justice.MethodsThe Index of Intergenerational Justice, applied to a broad sample of European countries, captures three key dimensions of justice: distributive fairness, social (status and relational) equality, and political equality. We focus on differences across age groups, rather than across cohorts, due to well-documented challenges in direct cohort comparisons. The distributive fairness dimension covers economics (relative poverty, unemployment, pernent contracts, wages), health (unmet medical needs), and the environment (environmental risk exposure). The social equality dimension captures social isolation (measured through leisure activities, internet access, social contacts, and close relationships), discrimination, and mental well-being. Finally, the political equality dimension considers political perceptions, political engagement, and political representation.ResultsPreliminary findings reveal substantial differences across age groups in the distributive fairness dimension. A cluster of countries appears to favor older adults, while another favors younger adults. By contrast, in the social equality dimension, nearly all countries tend to favor young adults.DiscussionThe Intergenerational Justice Index provides a valuable tool for assessing fairness across age groups. By highlighting disparities, it can inform and support public policies aimed at fostering more equitable relationships between generations.

Suggested Citation

  • Vincenzo Galasso & Anna Elisabetta Galeotti & Asya Bellia & Enrico Biale & Carlo Burelli & Davide Pala & Cristobal Ruiz-Tagle Colo & Laura Santi Antini & Gloria Zuccarelli, 2025. "An index of intergenerational justice: in concepts and preliminary evidence from the Age-It Research Program," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 80(Supplemen), pages 169-179.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:supplement_2:p:s169-s179.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbaf192
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:supplement_2:p:s169-s179.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.