IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v80y2025i9pgbaf133..html

Social exchange in intergenerational relationships over the family life course: reciprocity dynamics in support to older mothers

Author

Listed:
  • Merril Silverstein
  • Martin LakomýPh
  • Seonhwa Lee
  • Bo Jian
  • Wencheng Zhang
  • Daphna Gans

Abstract

ObjectivesParent–child relationships are characterized by exchanges of support across the family life course. This investigation examined whether earlier financial and service support provided by parents incentivized adult children to provide support to older mothers. Direct, indirect, anticipatory, and contingent reciprocity are employed to test four types of intergenerational exchange.MethodsData derived from 470 baby-boom children and their parents participating in the Longitudinal Study of Generations (LSOG). Parental provisions (financial and childcare support, bequest intentions, and assistance provided to grandparents) served as lagged predictors of instrumental and socioemotional support provided to older mothers in five waves between 1997 and 2021/2022. Multilevel models were estimated for 1,324 child–mother observations and tested the direct effects of parental provisions and their interaction with mothers’ vulnerability.ResultsFinancial support received by children predicted greater frequency of both types of support to mothers, demonstrating direct reciprocity. Adult children provided more socioemotional support to mothers who assisted their own parents, supporting indirect reciprocity. Financial support produced higher marginal returns of instrumental support to mothers with greater vulnerability, consistent with contingent reciprocity. Little evidence was found for anticipatory reciprocity inherent in a bequest motive.DiscussionResults were consistent with reciprocity as an underlying mechanism in intergenerational exchanges and revealed long-term consequences of parents’ resource distribution to children. Reciprocity as insurance against unmet needs was mostly limited to financial assistance, a key resource helping children manage the economic challenges of adulthood. We suggest future research continue to refine the theory and empirical identification of motivations behind intergenerational exchanges.

Suggested Citation

  • Merril Silverstein & Martin LakomýPh & Seonhwa Lee & Bo Jian & Wencheng Zhang & Daphna Gans, 2025. "Social exchange in intergenerational relationships over the family life course: reciprocity dynamics in support to older mothers," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 80(9), pages 133.-133..
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:9:p:gbaf133.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbaf133
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:9:p:gbaf133.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.